Leopold v. United Capital Corp.
Opinion
[554]*554Order, Supreme Court, New York County (O. Peter Sherwood, J.), entered November 8, 2012, which granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In this action governed by Delaware law, plaintiff alleges that the individual defendants who are owners and/or directors of the corporate defendant breached their fiduciary duties by delisting and deregistering the corporation’s common stock and by structuring a tender offer through an unfair process for inadequate consideration. The motion court properly dismissed plaintiffs claims as derivative, since they allege wrongs affecting both him and the corporation rather than “direct injury . . . independent of any alleged injury to the corporation” (Tooley v Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc., 845 A2d 1031, 1039 [Del 2004]). Concur — Gonzalez, EJ., Tom, Saxe, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
114 A.D.3d 553 (Leopold v. United Capital Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.