Leopold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leopold v. State

756 So. 2d 203, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4402, 2000 WL 377101

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 2000·No. No. 2D99-1489·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Kenneth Leopold appeals the order designating him as a sexual predator. We affirm that designation. See State v. Colley, 744 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). However, we strike the provision of the order requiring a hearing pursuant to section 775.225, Florida Statutes (1995), because that version of The Florida Sexual Predators Act does not apply to Leopold.

Affirmed in part; hearing provision stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLUE, Judge.

Kenneth Leopold appeals the order designating him as a sexual predator. We affirm that designation. See State v. Colley, 744 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). However, we strike the provision of the order requiring a hearing pursuant to section 775.225, Florida Statutes (1995), because that version of The Florida Sexual Predators Act does not apply to Leopold.

Affirmed in part; hearing provision stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.

Leopold v. State, 756 So. 2d 203, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4402, 2000 WL 377101 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

756 So. 2d 203 (Leopold v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related