Leopold v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leopold v. State

756 So. 2d 203, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4402, 2000 WL 377101

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 14, 2000

DocketNo. 2D99-1489

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 756 So. 2d 203 (Leopold v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leopold v. State, 756 So. 2d 203, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4402, 2000 WL 377101 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

Kenneth Leopold appeals the order designating him as a sexual predator. We affirm that designation. See State v. Colley, 744 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). However, we strike the provision of the order requiring a hearing pursuant to section 775.225, Florida Statutes (1995), because that version of The Florida Sexual Predators Act does not apply to Leopold.

Affirmed in part; hearing provision stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLUE, Judge.

Kenneth Leopold appeals the order designating him as a sexual predator. We affirm that designation. See State v. Colley, 744 So.2d 1172 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999); Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998). However, we strike the provision of the order requiring a hearing pursuant to section 775.225, Florida Statutes (1995), because that version of The Florida Sexual Predators Act does not apply to Leopold.

Affirmed in part; hearing provision stricken.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and STRINGER, J., Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

756 So. 2d 203, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4402, 2000 WL 377101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leopold-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack