Leopold v. Richard Bertram & Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leopold v. Richard Bertram & Co.

265 So. 2d 710

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 29, 1972

DocketNo. 72-758

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 265 So. 2d 710 (Leopold v. Richard Bertram & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leopold v. Richard Bertram & Co., 265 So. 2d 710 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By this interlocutory appeal we are called upon to review the propriety of a temporary injunction. Without passing on the merits, we reverse the order granting the temporary injunction because same failed to provide for the posting of a bond. Metropolitan Dade County v. Polk Pools, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 737; Hoffman v. White, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 43; Berry v. Morgan Adhesives Co., Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 691; Rule 1.610(b), R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

By this interlocutory appeal we are called upon to review the propriety of a temporary injunction. Without passing on the merits, we reverse the order granting the temporary injunction because same failed to provide for the posting of a bond. Metropolitan Dade County v. Polk Pools, Inc., Fla.App.1960, 124 So.2d 737; Hoffman v. White, Fla.App.1970, 235 So.2d 43; Berry v. Morgan Adhesives Co., Fla.App.1972, 262 So.2d 691; Rule 1.610(b), R.C.P., 31 F.S.A.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

265 So. 2d 710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leopold-v-richard-bertram-co-fladistctapp-1972.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack