Leoplian J. Gregory v. United States

391 F.2d 281, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8000
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 20, 1968
Docket21807
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 391 F.2d 281 (Leoplian J. Gregory v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leoplian J. Gregory v. United States, 391 F.2d 281, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8000 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The objections to the receipt in evidence of fingerprints and handwriting exemplars of Gregory without Escobedo-Miranda * warnings are not valid. Schmerber v. State of California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908; Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178; Lewis v. United States, D.C.Cir., 382 F.2d 817.

*282 The objection about no Negro on the jury (one was called but was removed by a peremptory challenge) we reject. There was no timely challenge to the panel.

Other points, too, we find without merit.

*

Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977; Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Weems v. United States
361 F. Supp. 922 (D. Maryland, 1973)
In re Shirley D.
63 Misc. 2d 1012 (NYC Family Court, 1970)
United States v. William De Palma
414 F.2d 394 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
391 F.2d 281, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leoplian-j-gregory-v-united-states-ca9-1968.