Leoplian J. Gregory v. United States

391 F.2d 281, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8000
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided February 20, 1968·No. 21807·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The judgment of conviction is affirmed.

The objections to the receipt in evidence of fingerprints and handwriting exemplars of Gregory without Escobedo-Miranda * warnings are not valid. Schmerber v. State of California, 384 U.S. 757, 86 S.Ct. 1826, 16 L.Ed.2d 908; Gilbert v. State of California, 388 U.S. 263, 87 S.Ct. 1951, 18 L.Ed.2d 1178; Lewis v. United States, D.C.Cir., 382 F.2d 817.

*282 The objection about no Negro on the jury (one was called but was removed by a peremptory challenge) we reject. There was no timely challenge to the panel.

Other points, too, we find without merit.

*

Escobedo v. State of Illinois, 378 U.S. 478, 84 S.Ct. 1758, 12 L.Ed.2d 977; Miranda v. State of Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leoplian J. Gregory v. United States, 391 F.2d 281, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 8000 (9th Cir. 1968).

391 F.2d 281 (Leoplian J. Gregory v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Weems v. United States
361 F. Supp. 922 (D. Maryland, 1973)
In re Shirley D.
63 Misc. 2d 1012 (NYC Family Court, 1970)
United States v. William De Palma
414 F.2d 394 (Ninth Circuit, 1969)