Leonhauser v. Hall

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Leonhauser v. Hall

2 N.J. Misc. 429, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 166

DecidedMay 26, 1924

StatusPublished

This text of 2 N.J. Misc. 429 (Leonhauser v. Hall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonhauser v. Hall, 2 N.J. Misc. 429, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 166 (N.J. 1924).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

This is a rule to show caiise, dated October 7th, 1921, why a judgment in ejectment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on December 8tli, 1921, should not be opened and the defendant permitted to file an answer. Under the rule testimony was taken. From that testimony our conclusion is that the defendant has failed to show a legal defense to the' action. The rule, therefore, is discharged, and the judgment entered December 8th, 1921, is allowed to stand.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

This is a rule to show caiise, dated October 7th, 1921, why a judgment in ejectment in favor of the plaintiff, entered on December 8tli, 1921, should not be opened and the defendant permitted to file an answer. Under the rule testimony was taken. From that testimony our conclusion is that the defendant has failed to show a legal defense to the' action. The rule, therefore, is discharged, and the judgment entered December 8th, 1921, is allowed to stand.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 N.J. Misc. 429, 1924 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonhauser-v-hall-nj-1924.