Leone v. State

666 So. 2d 1050, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 745, 1996 WL 34866
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 31, 1996·No. No. 95-1968·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

As nothing in this record reveals any bias, prejudice, or ill will on the part of the judge, but only the exercise of legitimate judicial function, the motion to disqualify was legally insufficient and properly denied. Jemigan v. State, 608 So.2d 569 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992); Nassetta v. Kaplan, 557 So.2d 919 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990).

However, it is also clear from the record and the State properly concedes, that, in the six eases in which the defendant’s probation was revoked, he was entitled to more than the 265 days of credit time served that he received, and the case is hereby remanded to the trial court with directions to recalculate the credit time served for which the defendant is entitled on his sentences. State v. Green, 547 So.2d 925 (Fla.1989).

Affirmed, in part; reversed, in part, and remanded with directions for recalculation.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leone v. State, 666 So. 2d 1050, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 745, 1996 WL 34866 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

666 So. 2d 1050 (Leone v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scott v. State
909 So. 2d 364 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)