Leone v. State
This text of 657 So. 2d 26 (Leone v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Richard LEONE, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
*27 Richard Leone, Raiford, pro se.
No appearance for respondent.
W. SHARP, Judge.
We deny Leone's petition for writ of habeas corpus. This petition is an abuse of process. Leone has filed three prior appeals pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850,[1] one previous petition for writ of error coram nobis,[2] and one other petition for writ of habeas corpus for a belated appeal.[3] Aside from the fact that Leone's arguments in this proceeding have little or no merit, they could and should have been raised either on direct appeal or encompassed in Leone's first rule 3.850 motion. Hardwick v. Dugger, 648 So.2d 100 (Fla. 1994). Enough surely is enough. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
DENIED.
GOSHORN and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.
NOTES
[1] Leone v. State, 519 So.2d 1000 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988) (Case No. 87-2222) (PCA).
[2] Leone v. State, 591 So.2d 663 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992) (Case No. 91-2425) (PCA).
[3] Leone v. State, Case No. 93-609 (Fla. 5th DCA Mar. 30, 1993) (Order).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
657 So. 2d 26, 1995 WL 340218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leone-v-state-fladistctapp-1995.