Leone v. City of New York

82 A.D.3d 476, 917 N.Y.2d 633
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 8, 2011·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[477] Petitioner commenced this proceeding after the expiration of the promotional list. As petitioner acknowledges, he may not be promoted from an expired list and the courts do not have the power to extend the life of a civil service list (see Matter of Deas v Levitt, 73 NY2d 525, 532-533 [1989]; Andriola v Ortiz, 156 AD2d 241, 242 [1989], appeal dismissed 75 NY2d 963 [1990]). Further, given, among other things, petitioner’s extensive disciplinary history, respondents had a rational basis for declining to promote him (see generally Matter of Straker v Giuliani, 292 AD2d 260 [2002], lv denied 98 NY2d 606 [2002]). Petitioner’s argument that he was the victim of the Department’s “illegal quota” system lacks evidentiary support. Concur — Tom, J.P, Sweeny, Renwick, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leone v. City of New York, 82 A.D.3d 476, 917 N.Y.2d 633 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

82 A.D.3d 476 (Leone v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Bertram v. Metropolitan Transp. Auth.
2024 NY Slip Op 05273 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)