Leone Plummer v. Charlene J. Reeves
This text of Leone Plummer v. Charlene J. Reeves (Leone Plummer v. Charlene J. Reeves) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Before QUINN and REAVIS, JJ. and BOYD, SJ. (1)
Appellant Leone Plummer filed a notice of appeal on November 27, 2001. The clerk's and reporter's records were filed on September 18, 2002, and Plummer's brief was due to be filed on October 18, 2002. It was not filed but instead Plummer's husband, who is not a licensed attorney, purported to represent her by seeking an extension of time to file the brief. On November 13, 2002, this court requested Plummer and her husband to show proof he was a licensed attorney. In response, we received a document entitled "Appeals Brief" signed by Plummer's husband.
By letter dated November 25, 2002, we notified Plummer that the brief had been struck because her husband lacked the legal authority to act on her behalf. So too did we order Plummer to file her brief on or before December 9, 2002, or the appeal would be dismissed. No brief or other response has been received.
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal pursuant to Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.8(a)(1) for want of prosecution.
Per Curiam
Do not publish.
1. John T. Boyd, Chief Justice (Ret.), Seventh Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. tex. gov't code
ann. §75.002(a)(1) (Vernon Supp. 2002).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leone Plummer v. Charlene J. Reeves, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leone-plummer-v-charlene-j-reeves-texapp-2002.