Leondre Walker v. Anthony Susano, Corporal; and Jennings, Corporal
This text of Leondre Walker v. Anthony Susano, Corporal; and Jennings, Corporal (Leondre Walker v. Anthony Susano, Corporal; and Jennings, Corporal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nebraska primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEBRASKA
LEONDRE WALKER,
Plaintiff, 8:25CV488
vs. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ANTHONY SUSANO, Corporal; and JENNINGS, Corporal;
Defendants.
This matter is before the Court for case management. The Prison Litigation Reform Act requires an imprisoned civil plaintiff to pay the Court’s entire filing fee, either at the outset when filing the complaint, or in installments if the Court grants leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). In re Tyler, 110 F.3d 528, 529–30 (8th Cir. 1997); Jackson v. N.P. Dodge Realty Co., 173 F. Supp. 2d 951 (D. Neb. 2001). On September 3, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion seeking leave to proceed IFP and ordered him to pay an initial partial filing fee in the amount of $6.13 within 30 days. See Filing No. 11. To date, Plaintiff has not paid the initial partial filing fee or asked for an extension of time in which to do so.1 Accordingly, the Court will require Plaintiff to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for his failure to pay the initial partial filing fee. If Plaintiff’s failure to pay by the Court’s deadline was caused by prison officials’ failure to adhere to his request to remit payment using funds from his account or other circumstances beyond his control, his failure to pay within the
1 Plaintiff did file a second motion to proceed IFP after his initial motion to proceed IFP was granted. See Filing No. 17. The Court denied the second IFP motion as moot and reiterated Plaintiff must pay the $6.13 initial partial filing fee no later than October 3, 2025. See Filing No. 18. time ordered by the Court will be excused. Absent a sufficient response, the case will be subject to dismissal. See Taylor v. Cassady, 570 Fed. App’x. 632 (8th Cir. 2014) (holding district court abused its discretion by dismissing case without first taking steps to determine whether prisoner-plaintiffs failure to pay the initial partial filing fee “was caused by circumstances beyond his control, such as prison officials’ failure to adhere to his request to remit payment using funds from his account’). IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff will have 30 days to show cause in writing why this case should not be dismissed for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee or to remit the $6.13 initial partial filing fee. In the absence of cause shown, this case will be dismissed without prejudice and without further notice. 2. The Clerk of Court is directed to set a pro se case management deadline in this case using the following text: November 19, 2025: check for response to show cause order.
Dated this 20th day of October, 2025. B je CO ART. John Gerrard ” enior United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Leondre Walker v. Anthony Susano, Corporal; and Jennings, Corporal, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leondre-walker-v-anthony-susano-corporal-and-jennings-corporal-ned-2025.