Leonberg v. Washington Mutual Bank, Fa
This text of 11 So. 3d 1014 (Leonberg v. Washington Mutual Bank, Fa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Loretta Leonberg, the homeowner, challenges the trial court’s final judgment of mortgage foreclosure, entered after summary judgment and in favor of Washington Mutual Bank, FA, the mortgage holder. We affirm the final judgment without comment. However, we remand the matter to the trial court solely for the purpose of conducting any further proceedings necessary on the foreclosure action, such as setting the date of the foreclosure sale. See McMillan v. Suncoast Sch. Fed. Credit Union, 741 So.2d 542, 542 (Fla. 2d DCA 1999) (affirming final judgment based on summary judgment but remanding “for further proceedings on the foreclosure action”).
We note that our affirmance is without prejudice to the rights of any party to seek, prior to the entry of the order setting the foreclosure sale, a modification of the amounts owed under the final judgment in light of the payment Washington Mutual received from an insurance claim after the subject property was substantially destroyed by a fire that occurred subsequent to the final judgment. See generally Lenart v. OCWEN Fin. Corp., 869 So.2d 588, 590-91 (Fla. 3d DCA 2004).
Affirmed; remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
11 So. 3d 1014, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 9444, 2009 WL 1975958, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonberg-v-washington-mutual-bank-fa-fladistctapp-2009.