Leonardo v. Metro Burak, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leonardo v. Metro Burak, Inc.

114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54057

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 25, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In a stockholder’s derivative action, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), dated March 25, 1985, which denied their motion for a protective order.

Order affirmed, with costs.

We agree with Special Term that a sufficient "basis for inquiry” exists on the face of the complaint to permit the requested discovery in this shareholder’s derivative action (see, Matter of Elias v Artistic Paper Box Co., 29 AD2d 118; Hegener v Party Tyme Prods., 24 AD2d 742; Pearson v Rosenberg, 22 AD2d 225). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In a stockholder’s derivative action, defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Richmond County (Felig, J.), dated March 25, 1985, which denied their motion for a protective order.

Order affirmed, with costs.

We agree with Special Term that a sufficient "basis for inquiry” exists on the face of the complaint to permit the requested discovery in this shareholder’s derivative action (see, Matter of Elias v Artistic Paper Box Co., 29 AD2d 118; Hegener v Party Tyme Prods., 24 AD2d 742; Pearson v Rosenberg, 22 AD2d 225). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, O’Connor, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Leonardo v. Metro Burak, Inc., 114 A.D.2d 1013, 496 N.Y.S.2d 346, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 54057 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

114 A.D.2d 1013 (Leonardo v. Metro Burak, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related