Leonardo Brenes Escobar v. Eric Holder, Jr.
This text of 516 F. App'x 626 (Leonardo Brenes Escobar v. Eric Holder, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Leonardo Arturo Brenes Escobar, a native and citizen of El Salvador, petitions pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) decision dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s removal order. We have jurisdiction un *627 der 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Freeman v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1031, 1037 (9th Cir.2006), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA properly concluded that Brenes Escobar did not establish eligibility for adjustment of status where he did not file an application for that form of relief or present evidence that he is the beneficiary of an approved or pending immigrant visa petition. See 8 U.S.C. §§ 1229a(c)(4), 1255(a).
Removal proceedings are separate and apart from bond proceedings, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.19(d), thus the BIA properly determined it did not have jurisdiction to review Brenes Escobar’s challenge to his bond proceedings in an appeal from removal proceedings.
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
516 F. App'x 626, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonardo-brenes-escobar-v-eric-holder-jr-ca9-2013.