Leonard v. State
Opinion
James B. LEONARD, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Upon consideration of the appellant's response to the Court's order of August 5, 2002, the Court has determined that the *409 appellant's motion for rehearing was not timely served, and therefore did not delay rendition of the Order Denying Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. See Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.530(b). Thus, the appellant's notice of appeal was not timely. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
ALLEN, C.J., WOLF and POLSTON, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
828 So. 2d 408 (Leonard v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.