Leonard v. Schwartz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leonard v. Schwartz

277 A.D.2d 1058

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1950

StatusPublished

This text of 277 A.D.2d 1058 (Leonard v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard v. Schwartz, 277 A.D.2d 1058 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to compel determination of a claim to real property, order denying a motion to direct plaintiff to bring in additional parties defendant, and for other relief, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. It is sufficient for the maintenance of this action that plaintiff claim an estate or interest in the real property, in order that judgment may be demanded that, the alleged deed be declared void and that appellant be barred from all claims to an estate or interest in the property by virtue thereof. The action then is not one which is adverse to the interest of sisters of the deceased Michael Gore, whose interest, if any, is dependent upon the value of the estate of the said decedent. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; MaeCrate, J., not voting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to compel determination of a claim to real property, order denying a motion to direct plaintiff to bring in additional parties defendant, and for other relief, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. It is sufficient for the maintenance of this action that plaintiff claim an estate or interest in the real property, in order that judgment may be demanded that, the alleged deed be declared void and that appellant be barred from all claims to an estate or interest in the property by virtue thereof. The action then is not one which is adverse to the interest of sisters of the deceased Michael Gore, whose interest, if any, is dependent upon the value of the estate of the said decedent. Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur; MaeCrate, J., not voting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 A.D.2d 1058, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-schwartz-nyappdiv-1950.