Leonard v. McMenamins Inc

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. Washington
DecidedMay 15, 2023
Docket2:22-cv-00094
StatusUnknown

This text of Leonard v. McMenamins Inc (Leonard v. McMenamins Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Washington primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leonard v. McMenamins Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Opinion

1 HONORABLE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 9 10 ANDREW LEONARD, NICHOLAS 11 || DEGRASSE, JAMES FRAZIER, AND 9-99 □□□ CHARLES FRYE, individually and on behalf of | “#¥S® N°-:22-ev-00094-BIR 12 |} all others similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 13 Plaintiffs, 14 v. 15 6 MCMENAMINS, INC., 7 Defendant. 18 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 19 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or 20 . . . . . . . . private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby 21 . □□ . . . . stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties 22 acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket 23 . . . . protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public 24 . oe ge . . . . disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential 25 treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file 26 Lae . confidential information under seal.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1 BRESKIN | JOHNSON | TOWNSEND □□□□ Cause No.: 2:22-cv-00094-BJR 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670

1 2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL 2 “Confidential” material shall include, but is not limited to, the following documents and 3 || tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: any sensitive personal and/or proprietary 4 || information disclosed during litigation proceedings between the Parties, whether disclosed in or 5 || derived from an interrogatory answer, a document, during a deposition or other testimony, any 6 || other form otherwise, that any Party or third party designates as “Confidential,” irrespective of by 7 || whom or when produced, including any financial records, personally identifiable information 8 || (including but not limited to the information that was compromised as a result of the Data Breach 9 || that is the subject of this litigation), documents reflecting policies and/or procedures regarding 10 || McMenamins’s data security practices in place at the time of the Data Breach and soon thereafter, 11 || reports and findings of external cybersecurity consultants (or similar entities) regarding the Data 12 || Breach, and any insurance policies that may cover the dispute. If highly sensitive information 13 || (proprietary or otherwise) is requested, the Parties reserve the right to ask the Court for additional 14 || protections from disclosure, if necessary. 15 |} 3. SCOPE 16 The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as 17 || defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all 18 || copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, 19 || conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. 20 || However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public 21 || domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise. 22 || 4. | ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 23 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed 24 || or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, 25 || defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the 26 || categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2 BRESKIN | JOHNSON | TOWNSEND □□□□ Cause No.: 2:22-cv-00094-BJR 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670

1 || must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures 2 || that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement. 3 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered 4 || by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any 5 || confidential material only to: 6 (a) the receiving party’s counsel of record in this action, as well as employees 7 || of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; 8 (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the 9 || receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties 10 || agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney’s Eyes Only and is so 11 || designated; 12 (c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this 13 | litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); 14 (d) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff; 15 (e) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication of 16 || confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service 17 || instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately 18 || return all originals and copies of any confidential material; 19 (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is 20 || reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” 21 || (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. Pages of 22 || transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential material must 23 || be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted 24 || under this agreement; 25 (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a 26 || custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 3 BRESKIN | JOHNSON | TOWNSEND □□□□ Cause No.: 2:22-cv-00094-BJR 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670

1 4.3 Filing Confidential Material. Before filing confidential material or discussing or 2 || referencing such material in court filings, the filing party shall confer with the designating party, 3 || in accordance with Local Civil Rule 5(g)(3)(A), to determine whether the designating party will 4 || remove the confidential designation, whether the document can be redacted, or whether a motion 5 || to seal or stipulation and proposed order is warranted. During the meet and confer process, the 6 || designating party must identify the basis for sealing the specific confidential information at issue, 7 || and the filing party shall include this basis in its motion to seal, along with any objection to sealing 8 || the information at issue. Local Civil Rule 5(g) sets forth the procedures that must be followed and 9 || the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material 10 || under seal. A party who seeks to maintain the confidentiality of its information must satisfy the 11 || requirements of Local Civil Rule 5(g)(3)(B), even if it is not the party filing the motion to seal. 12 || Failure to satisfy this requirement will result in the motion to seal being denied, in accordance with 13 || the strong presumption of public access to the Court’s files. 14 || 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 15 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each party 16 || or non-party that designates information or items for protection under this agreement must take 17 || care to limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate 18 || standards.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leonard v. McMenamins Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-mcmenamins-inc-wawd-2023.