Leonard v. McMenamins Inc

District Court, W.D. Washington·Decided May 15, 2023·No. 2:22-cv-00094·Unknown

Opinion

HONORABLE BARBARA J. ROTHSTEIN FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON ANDREW LEONARD, NICHOLAS DEGRASSE, JAMES FRAZIER, AND 9-99 □□□ CHARLES FRYE, individually and on behalf of | “#¥S® N°-:22-ev-00094-BIR } all others similarly situated, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER Plaintiffs, v. Defendant. 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, or . . . . . . . . private information for which special protection may be warranted. Accordingly, the parties hereby . □□ . . . . stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this agreement is consistent with LCR 26(c). It does not confer blanket . . . . protection on all disclosures or responses to discovery, the protection it affords from public . oe ge . . . . disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles, and it does not presumptively entitle parties to file Lae . confidential information under seal.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 1 BRESKIN | JOHNSON | TOWNSEND □□□□ Cause No.: 2:22-cv-00094-BJR 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670

2. “CONFIDENTIAL” MATERIAL “Confidential” material shall include, but is not limited to, the following documents and tangible things produced or otherwise exchanged: any sensitive personal and/or proprietary information disclosed during litigation proceedings between the Parties, whether disclosed in or derived from an interrogatory answer, a document, during a deposition or other testimony, any other form otherwise, that any Party or third party designates as “Confidential,” irrespective of by whom or when produced, including any financial records, personally identifiable information (including but not limited to the information that was compromised as a result of the Data Breach that is the subject of this litigation), documents reflecting policies and/or procedures regarding McMenamins’s data security practices in place at the time of the Data Breach and soon thereafter, reports and findings of external cybersecurity consultants (or similar entities) regarding the Data Breach, and any insurance policies that may cover the dispute. If highly sensitive information (proprietary or otherwise) is requested, the Parties reserve the right to ask the Court for additional protections from disclosure, if necessary. } 3. SCOPE The protections conferred by this agreement cover not only confidential material (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from confidential material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of confidential material; and (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by parties or their counsel that might reveal confidential material. However, the protections conferred by this agreement do not cover information that is in the public domain or becomes part of the public domain through trial or otherwise. || 4. | ACCESS TO AND USE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL 4.1 Basic Principles. A receiving party may use confidential material that is disclosed or produced by another party or by a non-party in connection with this case only for prosecuting, defending, or attempting to settle this litigation. Confidential material may be disclosed only to the categories of persons and under the conditions described in this agreement. Confidential material

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 2 BRESKIN | JOHNSON | TOWNSEND □□□□ Cause No.: 2:22-cv-00094-BJR 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670

must be stored and maintained by a receiving party at a location and in a secure manner that ensures that access is limited to the persons authorized under this agreement. 4.2 Disclosure of “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items. Unless otherwise ordered by the court or permitted in writing by the designating party, a receiving party may disclose any confidential material only to: (a) the receiving party’s counsel of record in this action, as well as employees of counsel to whom it is reasonably necessary to disclose the information for this litigation; (b) the officers, directors, and employees (including in house counsel) of the receiving party to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation, unless the parties agree that a particular document or material produced is for Attorney’s Eyes Only and is so designated; (c) experts and consultants to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary for this litigation and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A); (d) the court, court personnel, and court reporters and their staff; (e) copy or imaging services retained by counsel to assist in the duplication of confidential material, provided that counsel for the party retaining the copy or imaging service instructs the service not to disclose any confidential material to third parties and to immediately return all originals and copies of any confidential material; (f) during their depositions, witnesses in the action to whom disclosure is reasonably necessary and who have signed the “Acknowledgment and Agreement to Be Bound” (Exhibit A), unless otherwise agreed by the designating party or ordered by the court. Pages of transcribed deposition testimony or exhibits to depositions that reveal confidential material must be separately bound by the court reporter and may not be disclosed to anyone except as permitted under this agreement; (g) the author or recipient of a document containing the information or a custodian or other person who otherwise possessed or knew the information.

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER - 3 BRESKIN | JOHNSON | TOWNSEND □□□□ Cause No.: 2:22-cv-00094-BJR 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 3670

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leonard v. McMenamins Inc, (W.D. Wash. 2023).

Leonard v. McMenamins Inc (Leonard v. McMenamins Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.