Leonard v. Maxwell

Supreme Court

Leonard v. Maxwell

308 U.S. 516, 60 S. Ct. 175

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedNovember 13, 1939

DocketNo. 447

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 308 U.S. 516 (Leonard v. Maxwell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard v. Maxwell, 308 U.S. 516, 60 S. Ct. 175 (1939).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 93-95; Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495, 509-510; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S. 573, 578-581. (2) Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447, 457; Darnell v. Indiana, 226 U. S. 390, 398.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The motion to dismiss is also granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. (1) American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 93-95; Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495, 509-510; Rapid Transit Corp. v. New York, 303 U. S. 573, 578-581. (2) Smiley v. Kansas, 196 U. S. 447, 457; Darnell v. Indiana, 226 U. S. 390, 398.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

308 U.S. 516, 60 S. Ct. 175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-maxwell-scotus-1939.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack