Leonard v. Leonard

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Leonard v. Leonard

397 So. 2d 425, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19279

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedApril 24, 1981

DocketNo. 80-1434

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 397 So. 2d 425 (Leonard v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard v. Leonard, 397 So. 2d 425, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19279 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/wife appeals from the lower court’s order awarding only $1,390.00 in ar-rearages for child support when she had filed a motion for contempt alleging arrear-ages of $12,000.00.

On May 28,1980, a motion for an order of contempt along with a supplemental complaint for modification to increase child support was filed. A hearing on appellant’s motion was scheduled for June 17, 1980, at 11:00 a. m.

She drove from Port St. Lucie, her home, to St. Petersburg for the hearing; a distance of 175 miles. Appellant went to the office of her attorney so that he could direct her to the courthouse. Appellant- and her attorney arrived at the courthouse no more than three minutes after 11:00 a. m. Appellee and his attorney were leaving the courtroom and appellant’s attorney was informed by the trial judge that the hearing had been held at the scheduled time. Ap-pellee had been present with his attorney and apparently based solely upon appellee’s testimony, the trial judge ordered him to pay the amount of $1,390.00.-

While the trial court’s order might be sustainable as based upon the only evidence before him, we feel his failure to hear the appellant was an abuse of discretion. Ellard v. Godwin, 77 So.2d 617 (Fla.1955). We, therefore, reverse and remand for a full evidentiary hearing as to the amount of arrearages in child support.

SCHEB, C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellant/wife appeals from the lower court’s order awarding only $1,390.00 in ar-rearages for child support when she had filed a motion for contempt alleging arrear-ages of $12,000.00.

On May 28,1980, a motion for an order of contempt along with a supplemental complaint for modification to increase child support was filed. A hearing on appellant’s motion was scheduled for June 17, 1980, at 11:00 a. m.

She drove from Port St. Lucie, her home, to St. Petersburg for the hearing; a distance of 175 miles. Appellant went to the office of her attorney so that he could direct her to the courthouse. Appellant- and her attorney arrived at the courthouse no more than three minutes after 11:00 a. m. Appellee and his attorney were leaving the courtroom and appellant’s attorney was informed by the trial judge that the hearing had been held at the scheduled time. Ap-pellee had been present with his attorney and apparently based solely upon appellee’s testimony, the trial judge ordered him to pay the amount of $1,390.00.-

While the trial court’s order might be sustainable as based upon the only evidence before him, we feel his failure to hear the appellant was an abuse of discretion. Ellard v. Godwin, 77 So.2d 617 (Fla.1955). We, therefore, reverse and remand for a full evidentiary hearing as to the amount of arrearages in child support.

SCHEB, C. J., and OTT and CAMPBELL, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

397 So. 2d 425, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19279, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-leonard-fladistctapp-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack