Leonard v. King

274 P. 116, 128 Or. 216, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 29
Oregon Supreme Court·Decided January 29, 1929·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

CO SHOW, C. J.

The record does not present any question for determination by this court. It has been often decided that a question of fact once determined by a jury cannot be re-examined by this court: Const., Art. VII, § 3c.; Morser v. Southern Pacific Co., 124 Or. 384, 401 (262 Pac. 252); Crawford v. Cobbs & Mitchell Co., 121 Or. 636, 638 (257 Pac. 16); Thompson v. Larsen, 118 Or. 421, 428, 429 (247 Pac. 139). We are not justified in adding to the volume of decisions on that question. Our statute prescribes that the findings of a court in an action at law are equivalent to a verdict of a jury: Or. L., §159.

The judgments appealed from are affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leonard v. King, 274 P. 116, 128 Or. 216, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 29 (Or. 1929).

274 P. 116 (Leonard v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schlatter v. Willson
528 P.2d 1349 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1974)
Cochran v. Brooke
409 P.2d 904 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1966)
Head v. Lawrence
403 P.2d 17 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1965)
Jefferson Potato Co. v. Parkier
389 P.2d 342 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1964)
Berliner v. Brown, Doria & Hill
351 P.2d 692 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1960)
Honeywell v. Turner
332 P.2d 638 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1958)
Donis v. Sawyer Service, Inc.
21 P.2d 776 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1933)
Carstens Packing Co. v. Gross
283 P. 20 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1930)