Leonard v. King
Opinion
The record does not present any question for determination by this court. It has been often decided that a question of fact once determined by a jury cannot be re-examined by this court: Const., Art. VII, § 3c.; Morser v. Southern Pacific Co., 124 Or. 384, 401 (262 Pac. 252); Crawford v. Cobbs & Mitchell Co., 121 Or. 636, 638 (257 Pac. 16); Thompson v. Larsen, 118 Or. 421, 428, 429 (247 Pac. 139). We are not justified in adding to the volume of decisions on that question. Our statute prescribes that the findings of a court in an action at law are equivalent to a verdict of a jury: Or. L., §159.
The judgments appealed from are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
274 P. 116 (Leonard v. King) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.