Leonard v. King
This text of 274 P. 116 (Leonard v. King) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The record does not present any question for determination by this court. It has been often decided that a question of fact once determined by a jury cannot be re-examined by this court: Const., Art. VII, § 3c.; Morser v. Southern Pacific Co., 124 Or. 384, 401 (262 Pac. 252); Crawford v. Cobbs & Mitchell Co., 121 Or. 636, 638 (257 Pac. 16); Thompson v. Larsen, 118 Or. 421, 428, 429 (247 Pac. 139). We are not justified in adding to the volume of decisions on that question. Our statute prescribes that the findings of a court in an action at law are equivalent to a verdict of a jury: Or. L., §159.
The judgments appealed from are affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 P. 116, 128 Or. 216, 1929 Ore. LEXIS 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-king-or-1929.