Leonard v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Leonard v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co.

54 A. 577, 69 N.J.L. 238, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 199

CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey

DecidedFebruary 24, 1903

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 54 A. 577 (Leonard v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard v. Hoboken Printing & Publishing Co., 54 A. 577, 69 N.J.L. 238, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 199 (N.J. 1903).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The court properly refused to nonsuit the plaintiff or to direct a verdict for the defendant. There was no error in its rulings upon evidence or in its charge to the jury. The case was one in which the jury were justified'in awarding punitive damages; that they did so is evident from the amount of the verdict. . The damages being punitive, this court cannot say that they are excessive.

The rule to show cause will b'e discharged.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The court properly refused to nonsuit the plaintiff or to direct a verdict for the defendant. There was no error in its rulings upon evidence or in its charge to the jury. The case was one in which the jury were justified'in awarding punitive damages; that they did so is evident from the amount of the verdict. . The damages being punitive, this court cannot say that they are excessive.

The rule to show cause will b'e discharged.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A. 577, 69 N.J.L. 238, 1903 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-hoboken-printing-publishing-co-nj-1903.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack