Leonard v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission

836 So. 2d 1084, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1139, 2003 WL 244879
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 5, 2003·No. No. 3D02-1128·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Elroy A. Leonard appeals from an order of the Unemployment Appeals Commission affirming the denial of unemployment compensation benefits. For the following reasons, we reverse.

The employee’s attendance of a school picnic authorized by the host school and the students’ parents violated his employer’s policies, and justified his termination from employment. However, “the record does not contain substantial competent evidence to support a finding of misconduct serious enough to disqualify [him] from receiving unemployment compensation benefits.” Mitchell v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 804 So.2d 618, 618 (Fla. 3d DCA 2002) (citing Carmona v. [1085]*1085Florida Unemployment Appeals Comm’n, 826 So.2d 1014, 1015 (Fla. 3d DCA 2001)).

Accordingly, we reverse with directions to afford the claimant the entire amount of benefits claimed.

REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leonard v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission, 836 So. 2d 1084, 2003 Fla. App. LEXIS 1139, 2003 WL 244879 (Fla. Ct. App. 2003).

836 So. 2d 1084 (Leonard v. Florida Unemployment Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carmona v. FLORIDA UNEMPLOYMENT APPEALS COMMISSION
826 So. 2d 1014 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Mitchell v. Fla. Unemployment Appeals Comm'n
804 So. 2d 618 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)