Leonard v. Clove Valley Rod & Gun Club, Inc.

15 A.D.3d 547, 789 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1821

This text of 15 A.D.3d 547 (Leonard v. Clove Valley Rod & Gun Club, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leonard v. Clove Valley Rod & Gun Club, Inc., 15 A.D.3d 547, 789 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2005).

Opinion

In related actions for judgments declaring, inter alia, that the lawful boundary lines between two adjoining parcels of real property were as set forth in a map filed with the Dutchess County Clerk, the plaintiffs in action No. 2 appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Pagones, J.), dated July 31, 2003, which, inter alia, declared that the boundaries between the adjoining parcels were as set forth in a map prepared by the defendants’ expert.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court’s resolution of this boundary-line dispute was supported by the weight of the credible evidence, and thus, we decline to disturb it (see Schweitzer v Heppner, 212 AD2d 835 [1995]; Stratton v Keefe, 191 AD2d 871 [1993]).

The appellants’ remaining contentions are without merit. H. Miller, J.P, Cozier, Ritter and Spolzino, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Stratton v. Keefe
191 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
Schweitzer v. Heppner
212 A.D.2d 835 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
15 A.D.3d 547, 789 N.Y.S.2d 897, 2005 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-v-clove-valley-rod-gun-club-inc-nyappdiv-2005.