Leonard v. Caccippoli
103 N.J.L. 496
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Minturn, Kalisch, Black, Lloyd, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leonard v. Caccippoli, 103 N.J.L. 496 (N.J. 1927).
103 N.J.L. 496 (Leonard v. Caccippoli) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.