Leonard R. Richardson v. K. Jurgensen, C.U.S.

Ninth Circuit

Leonard R. Richardson v. K. Jurgensen, C.U.S.

60 F.3d 834, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25508, 1995 WL 392117

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJuly 3, 1995

Docket94-36092

StatusPublished

This text of 60 F.3d 834 (Leonard R. Richardson v. K. Jurgensen, C.U.S.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard R. Richardson v. K. Jurgensen, C.U.S., 60 F.3d 834, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25508, 1995 WL 392117 (9th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

60 F.3d 834
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Leonard R. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
K. JURGENSEN, C.U.S., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-36092.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Washington state prisoner Leonard R. Richardson appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant Jurgensen in Richardson's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that Jurgensen violated his constitutional rights by placing him in administrative segregation in retaliation for Richardson filing a grievance against a correctional officer. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which was adopted in full by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

60 F.3d 834
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.

Leonard R. RICHARDSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
K. JURGENSEN, C.U.S., Defendant-Appellee.

No. 94-36092.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted June 26, 1995.*
Decided July 3, 1995.

Before: O'SCANNLAIN, LEAVY and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM**

Washington state prisoner Leonard R. Richardson appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for defendant Jurgensen in Richardson's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action alleging that Jurgensen violated his constitutional rights by placing him in administrative segregation in retaliation for Richardson filing a grievance against a correctional officer. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291, and we affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, which was adopted in full by the district court.

AFFIRMED.

*

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed. R. App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

60 F.3d 834, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 25508, 1995 WL 392117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-r-richardson-v-k-jurgensen-cus-ca9-1995.