Leonard O'Neal Douglas v. Leon Fields Brittian Sa III Bacol Dr. Rojas of Perkins Dr. Torres of Perkins
This text of 887 F.2d 1078 (Leonard O'Neal Douglas v. Leon Fields Brittian Sa III Bacol Dr. Rojas of Perkins Dr. Torres of Perkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
887 F.2d 1078
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leonard O'Neal DOUGLAS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Leon FIELDS; Brittian; SA III BACOL; Dr. Rojas of
Perkins; Dr. Torres of Perkins, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 89-6637.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 31, 1989.
Decided: Sept. 27, 1989.
Leonard O'Neal Douglas, appellant pro se.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Leonard O'Neal Douglas appeals from the district court's order dismissing all but one of his claims. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 this Court has jurisdiction over appeals from final orders. A final order is one which disposes of all issues in dispute as to all parties. It "ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute the judgment." Catlin v. United States, 324 U.S. 229, 233 (1945).
As the order appealed from is not a final order, it is not appealable under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291. The district court has not directed entry of final judgment as to particular claims or parties under Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b), nor is the order appealable under the provisions of 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292. Finally, the order is not appealable as a collateral order under Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949).
Finding no basis for appellate jurisdiction, we dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues have been decided authoritatively.
DISMISSED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
887 F.2d 1078, 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 14390, 1989 WL 117851, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-oneal-douglas-v-leon-fields-brittian-sa-iii-bacol-dr-rojas-of-ca4-1989.