Leonard M. Harrell v. Doyle Alva Wester, Eugenia W. Pelt and Billy Wester Dickson, Pencie W. Wester

861 F.2d 1546, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18067, 1988 WL 130209
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leonard M. Harrell v. Doyle Alva Wester, Eugenia W. Pelt and Billy Wester Dickson, Pencie W. Wester. Read the opinion of the Court — 853 F.2d 828
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 27, 1988·No. 87-3716·Published

Opinion

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING

(Opinion August 29, 1988, 11 Cir., 853 F.2d 828).

Before TJOFLAT, VANCE and COX, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

On petition for rehearing appellee brings to our attention that the award by the district court that was the subject of this appeal included only $84,285.55 attributable to the proceeds of 284.43 acres of undistributed estate lands ordered to be conveyed to the plaintiff. The remaining $13,788.72 was awarded to the plaintiff in connection with a matter not directly related to the subject of this appeal and is not affected by our decision in this case.

Accordingly our opinion is modified to reverse only so much of the district court award as is equal to $84,285.55. The petition for rehearing is otherwise DENIED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leonard M. Harrell v. Doyle Alva Wester, Eugenia W. Pelt and Billy Wester Dickson, Pencie W. Wester, 861 F.2d 1546, 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 18067, 1988 WL 130209 (11th Cir. 1988).

861 F.2d 1546 (Leonard M. Harrell v. Doyle Alva Wester, Eugenia W. Pelt and Billy Wester Dickson, Pencie W. Wester) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related