Leonard Levin Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Leonard Levin Co. v. United States

36 Cust. Ct. 335

United States Customs Court·Decided February 2, 1956·No. No. 59704; protests 185667-K, etc. (Providence)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified, supra, for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra, as imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Wilson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that the merchandise is the same in all material respects as that the subject of Abstract 59105, the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (1) The items marked with the letter “A” at 10 percent under the provision in paragraph 1528, as modified, supra, for imitation semiprecious stones, faceted, and (2) the items marked with the letter “B” at 30 percent under said paragraph, as modified, supra, as imitation semiprecious stones, not faceted.

Leonard Levin Co. v. United States, 36 Cust. Ct. 335 (cusc 1956).

Pincite

36 Cust. Ct. 335 (Leonard Levin Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.