Leonard L. McLain v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Taxas Department of Corrections

Fifth Circuit

Leonard L. McLain v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Taxas Department of Corrections

441 F.2d 703, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10768

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedApril 13, 1971

Docket30147

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 441 F.2d 703 (Leonard L. McLain v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Taxas Department of Corrections) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard L. McLain v. Dr. George J. Beto, Director, Taxas Department of Corrections, 441 F.2d 703, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10768 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Court has carefully examined the record and considered all of the contentions made in the appellant’s brief. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion orders of January 30, 1970, and in light of Pate v. Robinson, 1966, 383 U.S. 375, 86 S.Ct. 836, 15 L.Ed.2d 815; Lee v. Alabama, 5 Cir. 1967, 386 F.2d 97; Floyd v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 365 F.2d 368; and Carroll v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 1065. See Local Rule 21. 1

Although the District Court ordered the State of Texas to retry or release McLain, this is not to be construed to prohibit any commitment made pursuant to article 46.02, Vernon’s Ann.Tex., C.C.P., nor to prevent proceeding under the Texas Mental Health Code, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., art. 5547-1 et seq., or any other relevant state procedure, nor to preclude subsequent trial at any time McLain is determined to be competent to stand trial.

1

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The Court has carefully examined the record and considered all of the contentions made in the appellant’s brief. The judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in the district court’s opinion orders of January 30, 1970, and in light of Pate v. Robinson, 1966, 383 U.S. 375, 86 S.Ct. 836, 15 L.Ed.2d 815; Lee v. Alabama, 5 Cir. 1967, 386 F.2d 97; Floyd v. United States, 5 Cir. 1966, 365 F.2d 368; and Carroll v. Beto, 5 Cir. 1970, 421 F.2d 1065. See Local Rule 21. 1

Although the District Court ordered the State of Texas to retry or release McLain, this is not to be construed to prohibit any commitment made pursuant to article 46.02, Vernon’s Ann.Tex., C.C.P., nor to prevent proceeding under the Texas Mental Health Code, Vernon’s Ann.Civ.St., art. 5547-1 et seq., or any other relevant state procedure, nor to preclude subsequent trial at any time McLain is determined to be competent to stand trial.

1

. See N. L. R. B. v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir., 1970, 430 F.2d 966.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

441 F.2d 703, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 10768, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-l-mclain-v-dr-george-j-beto-director-taxas-department-of-ca5-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack