Leonard K. Hansford v. United States of America, Cicero Martin, Jr. v. United States

272 F.2d 533
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedNovember 12, 1959
Docket15115_1
StatusPublished

This text of 272 F.2d 533 (Leonard K. Hansford v. United States of America, Cicero Martin, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leonard K. Hansford v. United States of America, Cicero Martin, Jr. v. United States, 272 F.2d 533 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Opinion

272 F.2d 533

106 U.S.App.D.C. 304

Leonard K. HANSFORD, Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.
Cicero MARTIN, Jr., Appellant,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

Nos. 15114, 15115.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued Nov. 3, 1959.
Decided Nov. 12, 1959.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; David A. Pine, District Judge.

Mr. Bryce Rea, Jr., Washington, D.C. (appointed by this court) for appellant in No. 15114.

Mr. Joseph S. McCarthy, Washington, D.C. (appointed by this court) for appellant in No. 15115.

Mr. Nathan J. Paulson, Asst. U.S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U.S. Atty., and Carl W. Belcher, Asst. U.S. Atty., were on the brief, for appellee.

Before PRETTYMAN, Chief Judge, and EDGERTON and DANAHER, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

These appellants, first in the District Court, and now here have challenged their arrest without a warrant. We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 F.2d 533, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-k-hansford-v-united-states-of-america-cicero-martin-jr-v-cadc-1959.