Leonard K. Hansford, Jr. v. United States

D.C. Circuit

Leonard K. Hansford, Jr. v. United States

267 F.2d 663, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 386, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3839

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMay 21, 1959

Docket14932_1

StatusPublished

This text of 267 F.2d 663 (Leonard K. Hansford, Jr. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard K. Hansford, Jr. v. United States, 267 F.2d 663, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 386, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3839 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from conviction for violation of the Narcotics Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 171 et seq., the grounds of the ap *664 peal being the refusal of a witness to answer certain questions on the ground of possible self-incrimination, and failure of the trial court to grant a mistrial because of statements made by a witness.

We find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from conviction for violation of the Narcotics Act, 21 U.S.C.A. § 171 et seq., the grounds of the ap *664 peal being the refusal of a witness to answer certain questions on the ground of possible self-incrimination, and failure of the trial court to grant a mistrial because of statements made by a witness.

We find no error.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

267 F.2d 663, 105 U.S. App. D.C. 386, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-k-hansford-jr-v-united-states-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack