Leonard J. Shafitz v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Leonard J. Shafitz v. United States

230 F.2d 606, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3293

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 28, 1956

Docket12562_1

StatusPublished

This text of 230 F.2d 606 (Leonard J. Shafitz v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard J. Shafitz v. United States, 230 F.2d 606, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3293 (6th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

*607 PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the district court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding appellant guilty upon a ten count indictment of using the mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341, was heard on the record, briefs, and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the essential facts constituting the offenses charged were sufficiently set out in the indictment, Anderson v. United States, 6 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 84; that there was substantial credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict as to all elements of the offenses prohibited by the statute; and that in instructing the jury the district judge committed no error prejudicial to the appellant, Pereira v. United States, 1954, 347 U.S. 1, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435.

It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*607 PER CURIAM.

This appeal from the district court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding appellant guilty upon a ten count indictment of using the mails to defraud in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1341, was heard on the record, briefs, and oral argument of counsel.

And it appearing that the essential facts constituting the offenses charged were sufficiently set out in the indictment, Anderson v. United States, 6 Cir., 1954, 215 F.2d 84; that there was substantial credible evidence to support the jury’s verdict as to all elements of the offenses prohibited by the statute; and that in instructing the jury the district judge committed no error prejudicial to the appellant, Pereira v. United States, 1954, 347 U.S. 1, 74 S.Ct. 358, 98 L.Ed. 435.

It is ordered that the judgment of the district court be and it hereby is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

230 F.2d 606, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-j-shafitz-v-united-states-ca6-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack