Leonard F. Ruhl v. Samuel Luper, Trustee in Bankruptcy

Sixth Circuit

Leonard F. Ruhl v. Samuel Luper, Trustee in Bankruptcy

244 F.2d 957, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4346

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 19, 1957

Docket12961_1

StatusPublished

This text of 244 F.2d 957 (Leonard F. Ruhl v. Samuel Luper, Trustee in Bankruptcy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leonard F. Ruhl v. Samuel Luper, Trustee in Bankruptcy, 244 F.2d 957, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4346 (6th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the husband of a bankrupt from the judgment of the district court holding that a certain lot in Upper Arlington, Franklin County, Ohio, be subjected to a lien of $5,075, for the benefit of the bankrupt estate of the wife;

And it appearing from a consideration of the briefs and arguments of attorneys and from the record in the case that there was ample substantial evidence to *958 support the findings of fact of District Judge Cecil (which were certainly not clearly erroneous) embraced in his opinion, D.C., 148 F.Supp. 888, and that his conclusions of law upon which his decision was based were correctly drawn;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the husband of a bankrupt from the judgment of the district court holding that a certain lot in Upper Arlington, Franklin County, Ohio, be subjected to a lien of $5,075, for the benefit of the bankrupt estate of the wife;

And it appearing from a consideration of the briefs and arguments of attorneys and from the record in the case that there was ample substantial evidence to *958 support the findings of fact of District Judge Cecil (which were certainly not clearly erroneous) embraced in his opinion, D.C., 148 F.Supp. 888, and that his conclusions of law upon which his decision was based were correctly drawn;

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

244 F.2d 957, 1957 U.S. App. LEXIS 4346, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-f-ruhl-v-samuel-luper-trustee-in-bankruptcy-ca6-1957.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack