Leonard Edward Villarreal III v. the State of Texas

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 1, 2025
Docket02-25-00084-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Leonard Edward Villarreal III v. the State of Texas (Leonard Edward Villarreal III v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leonard Edward Villarreal III v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Opinion

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________

No. 02-25-00084-CR ___________________________

LEONARD EDWARD VILLARREAL III, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

On Appeal from the 355th District Court Hood County, Texas Trial Court No. CR14507

Before Wallach, J.; Sudderth, C.J.; and Walker, J. Per Curiam Memorandum Opinion MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant Leonard Edward Villarreal III appeals from the trial court’s January

24, 2025 judgment. The record before this court does not reflect that Appellant filed a

motion for new trial. Accordingly, Appellant’s notice of appeal was due no later than

February 24, 2025. See Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a). However, Appellant did not file his

notice of appeal until March 18, 2025, which was outside the 30-day period for filing a

notice of appeal and the 15-day period for filing a motion for extension of time. See

Tex. R. App. P. 26.2(a)(1), 26.3.

We notified Appellant of our concern that this court did not have jurisdiction

over his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b); Olivo v. State, 918 S.W.2d 519, 522 (Tex.

Crim. App. 1996) (“A timely notice of appeal is necessary to invoke a court of

appeals’ jurisdiction.”). We cautioned him that we could dismiss the appeal unless, by

March 31, 2025, he or any other party wanting to continue the appeal filed with this

court a response showing grounds for the appeal’s continuance. We have not received

a response.

Because Appellant’s notice of appeal was not timely filed, we have no

jurisdiction over his appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b), 26.2(a); Olivo, 918 S.W.2d at

2 522–23. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction.1 See Tex. R. App. P.

43.2(f).

Per Curiam

Do Not Publish Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

Delivered: May 1, 2025

The dismissal of his appeal does not prevent Appellant from filing an 1

application for writ of habeas corpus returnable to the Court of Criminal Appeals for consideration of an out-of-time appeal. See Tex. Code Crim. Proc. Ann. art. 11.07.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Olivo v. State
918 S.W.2d 519 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leonard Edward Villarreal III v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-edward-villarreal-iii-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2025.