Leonard Bell v. Robert E. English, Librarian, D. Graham, Assistant Warden of Brunswick Correctional Center

836 F.2d 545, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16620, 1987 WL 30196
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedDecember 23, 1987
Docket87-7355
StatusUnpublished

This text of 836 F.2d 545 (Leonard Bell v. Robert E. English, Librarian, D. Graham, Assistant Warden of Brunswick Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leonard Bell v. Robert E. English, Librarian, D. Graham, Assistant Warden of Brunswick Correctional Center, 836 F.2d 545, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16620, 1987 WL 30196 (4th Cir. 1987).

Opinion

836 F.2d 545
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leonard BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Robert E. ENGLISH, Librarian, D. Graham, Assistant Warden of
Brunswick Correctional Center, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 87-7355.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 23, 1987.
Decided Dec. 23, 1987.

Leonard Bell, appellant pro se.

Before K.K. HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Leonard Bell, a Virginia inmate, appeals the dismissal of this 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 complaint as frivolous under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1915(d). Bell alleged that he was racially discriminated against because he was required to strip the prison law library floors while white inmates were not so required and were given office work instead.

We find that the dismissal was premature. The complaint states a racial discrimination claim, see Henry v. Van Cleve, 469 F.2d 687 (5th Cir.1972), and is not legally frivolous, see Boyce v. Alizaduh, 595 F.2d 948 (4th Cir.1979). Accordingly, we remand this case for further development. We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

VACATED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boyce v. Alizaduh
595 F.2d 948 (Fourth Circuit, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
836 F.2d 545, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 16620, 1987 WL 30196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leonard-bell-v-robert-e-english-librarian-d-graham-ca4-1987.