Leon v. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC

Opinion

ARIEL LEON, Case No. 2:24-cv-00714-ART-BNW Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING R&R v. (ECF No. 25) WYNN LAS VEGAS, LLC, et al.,

Defendants.

Plaintiff Ariel Leon sued his former employer Defendant Wynn Las Vegas and associated Defendants for discrimination. This Court dismissed Plaintiff’s complaint without prejudice and with leave to amend by March 10, 2025. (ECF No. 22.) Magistrate Judge Weksler ordered Plaintiff to file an amended complaint by May 6, 2025, or she would recommend that the case be dismissed. (See ECF No. 24.) Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint, nor did he move for an extension of time to file. Accordingly, Magistrate Judge Weksler issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) this case be dismissed without prejudice and closed. (ECF No. 25.) Under the Federal Magistrates Act, a Court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by [a] magistrate judge.” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Where, as here, neither party objects to a magistrate judge's recommendation, the district court is not required to perform any review of that judge's conclusions. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). Leon did not object to Judge Weksler’s R&R, and the time to do so has now passed. The Court finds Judge Weksler’s reasoning persuasive and adopts the R&R (ECF No. 25) in full. // 1 The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close 2 this case. 3 4 DATED: June 2, 2025 5 ° jlosed Aw ] UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9