Leon v. Leon
This text of 553 So. 2d 221 (Leon v. Leon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant challenges an increase in his child support payment from $25.00 a week to $65.00 a week, and the finding of the trial judge that the appellant is in contempt for failure to pay the arrearage in child support created by the increase.
The trial judge modified the child support payment after a hearing of which there is no transcript. The appellant claims a change of circumstances since that hearing, which he argues is reflected in the transcript of the hearing on the appellant’s motion for rehearing with respect to the modification. The relief sought by the appellant is by way of a petition for modification based on the change of circumstances rather than by rehearing. Dulle v. Dulle, 325 So.2d 441 (Fla.3d DCA 1976).
We find no error in the trial judge’s finding the appellant in contempt for failure to pay arrearages in his child support payments. The record supports the trial judge’s conclusion that the appellant has the means to pay those arrearages.
Accordingly, we affirm without prejudice to the appellant’s pursuing a petition for modification of the child support payments. Dulle v. Dulle.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
553 So. 2d 221, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2622, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6288, 1989 WL 135392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leon-v-leon-fladistctapp-1989.