Leon Staley, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

23 F.3d 403, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18557, 1994 WL 170707
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 6, 1994
Docket93-6987
StatusPublished

This text of 23 F.3d 403 (Leon Staley, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leon Staley, Jr. v. State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina, 23 F.3d 403, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18557, 1994 WL 170707 (4th Cir. 1994).

Opinion

23 F.3d 403
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Leon STALEY, Jr., Petitioner Appellant,
v.
STATE of South Carolina; Attorney General of the State of
South Carolina, Respondents Appellees.

No. 93-6987.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted April 21, 1994.
Decided May 6, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-92-3554-8AJ-3)

Leon Staley, Jr., appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, S.C., for appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MICHAEL, Circuit Judge, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Staley v. South Carolina, No. CA-92-3554-8AJ-3 (D.S.C. Aug. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 F.3d 403, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 18557, 1994 WL 170707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leon-staley-jr-v-state-of-south-carolina-attorney--ca4-1994.