Leon R. v. Palmer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Leon R. v. Palmer

266 A.D.2d 218, 697 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11100

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 1, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 218 (Leon R. v. Palmer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leon R. v. Palmer, 266 A.D.2d 218, 697 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11100 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 330.20 (9) for a subsequent retention order, John Palmer, the Executive Director of Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated November 16, 1998, which, upon rehearing and review pursuant to CPL 330.20 (16) and Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35, in effect, denied the petition and directed the release of Leon R. under appropriate conditions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In 1988, Leon R. was committed to a secure psychiatric facility pursuant to CPL 330.20 after he was found not responsible due to mental disease or defect for the death of a fellow prison inmate. In or about December 1989 he was transferred to Kingsboro Psychiatric Center (hereinafter Kingsboro), a nonsecure facility, where, pursuant to multiple retention orders, he has remained. After the appellant obtained the most recent retention order, Leon R. sought and obtained a rehearing and review pursuant to CPL 330.20 (16) and Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35. After hearing testimony from Leon R.’s treating psychiatrist and a psychiatrist who testified on his behalf, the hearing court found that Leon R. is neither mentally ill nor suffering from a dangerous mental condition and ordered his release subject to various conditions (see, CPL 330.20 [9]).

The undisputed evidence established that Leon R. has exhibited no symptoms of mental illness during the nine years between his transfer to Kingsboro and the instant rehearing. Moreover, he did not suffer any relapse during a sixteen-month period when his treatment protocol did not include medication. Giving the determination of the hearing court the deference to which it is entitled (see, Matter of George L., 85 NY2d 295, 305), the hearing court properly found that the appellant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Leon R. has a dangerous mental disorder or that he is mentally ill (see, CPL 330.20 [9]; Matter of George L., supra; People v Escobar, 61 [219]*219NY2d 431; Matter of Richard W., 250 AD2d 695; Matter of Buthy, 168 AD2d 1000). Accordingly, the order, inter alia, directing his release upon appropriate conditions is affirmed. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In a proceeding pursuant to CPL 330.20 (9) for a subsequent retention order, John Palmer, the Executive Director of Kingsboro Psychiatric Center, appeals, by permission, from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), dated November 16, 1998, which, upon rehearing and review pursuant to CPL 330.20 (16) and Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35, in effect, denied the petition and directed the release of Leon R. under appropriate conditions.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

In 1988, Leon R. was committed to a secure psychiatric facility pursuant to CPL 330.20 after he was found not responsible due to mental disease or defect for the death of a fellow prison inmate. In or about December 1989 he was transferred to Kingsboro Psychiatric Center (hereinafter Kingsboro), a nonsecure facility, where, pursuant to multiple retention orders, he has remained. After the appellant obtained the most recent retention order, Leon R. sought and obtained a rehearing and review pursuant to CPL 330.20 (16) and Mental Hygiene Law § 9.35. After hearing testimony from Leon R.’s treating psychiatrist and a psychiatrist who testified on his behalf, the hearing court found that Leon R. is neither mentally ill nor suffering from a dangerous mental condition and ordered his release subject to various conditions (see, CPL 330.20 [9]).

The undisputed evidence established that Leon R. has exhibited no symptoms of mental illness during the nine years between his transfer to Kingsboro and the instant rehearing. Moreover, he did not suffer any relapse during a sixteen-month period when his treatment protocol did not include medication. Giving the determination of the hearing court the deference to which it is entitled (see, Matter of George L., 85 NY2d 295, 305), the hearing court properly found that the appellant failed to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that Leon R. has a dangerous mental disorder or that he is mentally ill (see, CPL 330.20 [9]; Matter of George L., supra; People v Escobar, 61 [219]*219NY2d 431; Matter of Richard W., 250 AD2d 695; Matter of Buthy, 168 AD2d 1000). Accordingly, the order, inter alia, directing his release upon appropriate conditions is affirmed. O’Brien, J. P., Santucci, Thompson and Altman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

266 A.D.2d 218, 697 N.Y.S.2d 693, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leon-r-v-palmer-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack