Leon Maurice Ager, et al. v. Roger Goodell, et al.

S.D. New York

Leon Maurice Ager, et al. v. Roger Goodell, et al.

DecidedSeptember 11, 2025

Docket1:25-cv-03630

StatusUnknown

This text of Leon Maurice Ager, et al. v. Roger Goodell, et al. (Leon Maurice Ager, et al. v. Roger Goodell, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leon Maurice Ager, et al. v. Roger Goodell, et al., (S.D.N.Y. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX LEON MAURICE AGER, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 25-CV-3630 (JMF) -V- : : ORDER ROGER GOODELL, et al., : Defendants. : wee KX JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On June 4, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 9. On July 17, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of its prior Order. ECF No. 14. On September 9, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a new motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 21. Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED, substantially for reasons stated in the Court’s earlier Orders. Among other things, Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate that they would suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, both because they appear to have waited for years to seek relief and because any harm could be remedied through monetary damages. See, e.g., ECF No. 9 (citing Sibanda v. Elison, No. 23-CV-5752 (JMF), 2023 WL 7165046, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2023), and Monowise Ltd. Corp. v. Ozy Media, Inc., No. 17-CV-8028 (JMF), 2018 WL 2089342, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 2018)). Plaintiffs are cautioned that filing additional motions for preliminary relief (or for reconsideration), absent a material change in circumstances, may result in sanctions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 21 and mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2025 New York, New York SSE RMAN ited States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee KX LEON MAURICE AGER, et al., : Plaintiffs, : : 25-CV-3630 (JMF) -V- : : ORDER ROGER GOODELL, et al., : Defendants. : wee KX JESSE M. FURMAN, United States District Judge: On June 4, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 9. On July 17, 2025, the Court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for reconsideration of its prior Order. ECF No. 14. On September 9, 2025, Plaintiffs filed a new motion for a preliminary injunction. ECF No. 21. Plaintiffs’ motion is DENIED, substantially for reasons stated in the Court’s earlier Orders. Among other things, Plaintiffs fail to demonstrate that they would suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an injunction, both because they appear to have waited for years to seek relief and because any harm could be remedied through monetary damages. See, e.g., ECF No. 9 (citing Sibanda v. Elison, No. 23-CV-5752 (JMF), 2023 WL 7165046, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Oct. 31, 2023), and Monowise Ltd. Corp. v. Ozy Media, Inc., No. 17-CV-8028 (JMF), 2018 WL 2089342, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. May 3, 2018)). Plaintiffs are cautioned that filing additional motions for preliminary relief (or for reconsideration), absent a material change in circumstances, may result in sanctions. The Clerk of Court is directed to terminate ECF No. 21 and mail a copy of this Order to Plaintiffs. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 11, 2025 New York, New York SSE RMAN ited States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Leon Maurice Ager, et al. v. Roger Goodell, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leon-maurice-ager-et-al-v-roger-goodell-et-al-nysd-2025.