Leon Laviolette v. Michael Rutherford
Opinion
NO. 14-14-00555
IN THE FOURTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS FILED IN 14th COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON TEXAS HOUSTON, TEXAS 4/16/2015 7:16:24 AM CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk LEON LAVIOLETTE and PAMELA LAVIOLETTE,
Appellants,
V.
MICHAEL RUTHERFORD,
Appellee.
Appealed from the 190th District Court,
Harris County, Texas
APPELLANTS' MOTION TO SEAL MEDICAL RECORDS
Jason M. Bone Texas Bar No. 24001108 P.O. Box 2853 Conroe, TX 77305 Telephone: 936-499-6332 Email: bonejason1@gmail.com
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANTS, LEON LAVIOLETTE
APPELLANT REQUESTS ORAL ARGUMENT NO. 14-14-00555
LEON LAVIOLETTE and PAMELA LAVIOLETTE,
IDENTITY OF PARTIES & COUNSEL
Leon Laviolette, Appellant
Represented by: Jason M. Bone Texas Bar No. 24001108 P.O. Box 2853 Conroe, TX 77305 Telephone: 936-499-6332 Email: bonejason1@gmail.com
Michael Rutherford, Appellee
Represented by: John W. Palisin Texas Bar No. 15423700 1225 North Loop West, Suite 100 Houston, Texas 77008 Telephone: 713-354-4510 Facsimile: 866-842-6388
Appellants' Motion to Seal Page 2 of 7 Email: jpalisi1@progressive.com
Appellants' Motion to Seal Page 3 of 7 TABLE OF CONTENTS
IDENTITY OF PARTIES & COUNSEL 2-3
STATEMENT OF THE CASE 5
REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT 5
REQUEST TO SEAL MEDICAL RECORDS 6
PRAYER 6
CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE 7
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 7
Appellants' Motion to Seal Page 4 of 7 STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Nature of the case. Appellants sued appellee for monetary damages
for personal injuries from an automobile collision with Appellee.
Course of Proceedings. The trial court dismissed the case for want of
prosecution. Appellants filed a notice of appeal. Appellants did not timely
file their brief. The appeals court ordered appellant to file his brief along
with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late on or before
February 12, 2015. Appellants did not file the brief or the motion by such
date and the appeals court dismissed the case for want of prosecution.
Appellants have filed another motion to reinstate which is pending before
the appeals court.
Trial court disposition. The trial court dismissed the case for want of
prosecution.
STATEMENT ON ORAL ARGUMENT
The Court should grant oral argument because oral argument would
give the Court a more complete understanding of the facts presented in this
motion to seal.
Appellants' Motion to Seal Page 5 of 7 REQUEST TO SEAL MEDICAL RECORDS
Appellants, Leon and Pamela Laviolette, request that their attorney,
Jason Bone, be allowed to file his personal and private medical records in
this court in a sealed manner or in a manner that they cannot be view by the
general public on in the Internet or otherwise. The content of the medical
records detail medical conditions and treatment for same and offer a
reasonable explanation, which the appeal's court has requested, as to why
the Appellants' brief was not timely filed.
PRAYER
For the reasons stated in this motion, Appellants ask the Court to
grant this motion and order that Jason Bone may file his private medical
records electronically and that such records will be sealed and not available
to the general public on the Internet or otherwise.
Respectfully submitted,
ason M. Bone State Bar No.: 24001108 P.O. Box 2853 Conroe, TX 77305 Telephone: 936-499-6332 Email: bonejason1@gmail.com Attorney for Appellants, Lee and Pamela Laviolette
Appellants' Motion to Seal Page 6 of 7 CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
I certify that this document is in a type-face no smaller than 14-point
and the word count of the document is 534.
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that a true and correct copy of this motion was served on
Michael Rutherford through his counsel of record, John W. Palisin byemail
atjpalisi1@progressive.com on April 16, 2015.
son M. Bone
Appellants' Motion to Seal Page 7 of 7
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Leon Laviolette v. Michael Rutherford (Leon Laviolette v. Michael Rutherford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.