Leon Epstein v. Lester G. Maddox
This text of 401 F.2d 777 (Leon Epstein v. Lester G. Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
401 F.2d 777
Leon EPSTEIN et al., Appellants,
v.
Lester G. MADDOX et al., Appellees.
No. 25819.
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.
Oct. 25, 1968.
Leon S. Epstein, Wesley Asinof, Atlanta, Ga., for appellants.
Harold N. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., John Tye Ferguson, Arthur K. Bolton, Atty. Gen., J. Robert Coleman, Asst. Atty. Gen., Atlanta, Ga., for appellees.
Before BELL and MORGAN, Circuit Judges, and GUINN, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is without redeeming merit. The judgment of the District Court, 277 F.Supp. 613, is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
401 F.2d 777, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leon-epstein-v-lester-g-maddox-ca5-1968.