Leon Decorating Co. v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp.

191 Misc. 89, 76 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided January 29, 1948·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Memorandum Per Curiam.

Defendant 0 ’Kane, as lessee, was obligated under the terms of the lease made with defendant-respondent Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., the owner, to do certain alteration work. This was a sufficient consent to make the owner liable for the painting work necessarily done by plaintiff in connection with the alteration. It was not necessary that plaintiff obtain a separate consent from the owner in order to be afforded the protection given by section 3 of the Lien Law.

The judgment should be reversed, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leon Decorating Co. v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp., 191 Misc. 89, 76 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1948 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2096 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1948).

191 Misc. 89 (Leon Decorating Co. v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mathies Well & Pump Co. v. Plainview Jewish Center
42 Misc. 2d 569 (New York Supreme Court, 1964)
Leon Decorating Co. v. Fifth Avenue Realty Corp.
275 A.D.2d 915 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1949)