Leon County v. Stephen S. Dobson, III, P.A.

906 So. 2d 357, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10911, 2005 WL 1651705
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leon County v. Stephen S. Dobson, III, P.A.. Read the opinion of the Court — 917 So. 2d 278
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 15, 2005·No. No. 1D05-2269·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellant’s response to the Court’s order of March 25, 2005, the Court has determined that the appellant has failed to demonstrate that the order on appeal is a final order or an otherwise appealable nonfinal order. See Scullin v. City of Pensacola, 667 So.2d 215, 215-16 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995) (dismissing the appeal of an order granting a motion to award attorney’s fees and costs but reserving jurisdiction to determine the amount). For this reason, the appeal is hereby dismissed.

BROWNING, POLSTON AND HAWKES, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leon County v. Stephen S. Dobson, III, P.A., 906 So. 2d 357, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10911, 2005 WL 1651705 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

906 So. 2d 357 (Leon County v. Stephen S. Dobson, III, P.A.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Scullin v. City of Pensacola
667 So. 2d 215 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)