Leon Alcorn v. Steve Smith, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory

740 F.2d 3, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20716
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Leon Alcorn v. Steve Smith, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory. Read the opinion of the Court — 781 F.2d 58
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided July 9, 1984·No. 82-5623_1·Published

Opinion

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Before the panel is the Petitioner-Appellant’s Petition for Rehearing of 724 F.2d 37, and Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc. The Court did not favor rehearing en banc and the petition was referred to the panel for decision.

Appellant has also filed a Motion for Leave to file an Appendix. The appendix has been considered by the panel along with the brief and argument of petitioner.

Petitioner urges the Court to reconsider the en banc holding of Bowen v. Tennessee, 698 F.2d 241 (6th Cir.1983), that the issue of exhaustion may not be waived. This the Court declines to do and Bovien controls the decision in this case.

The petition for rehearing is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leon Alcorn v. Steve Smith, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory, 740 F.2d 3, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 20716 (6th Cir. 1984).

740 F.2d 3 (Leon Alcorn v. Steve Smith, Warden, Kentucky State Reformatory) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quinton Bowen v. State of Tennessee
698 F.2d 241 (Sixth Circuit, 1983)