Leola Stuart v. Estella Judson

Fifth Circuit

Leola Stuart v. Estella Judson

582 F. App'x 546

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 10, 2014

Docket14-50063

StatusUnpublished

This text of 582 F. App'x 546 (Leola Stuart v. Estella Judson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leola Stuart v. Estella Judson, 582 F. App'x 546 (5th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Leola Adelena Stuart moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of her motion for a restraining order, which was construed as a motion for a temporary restraining order. Additionally, she seeks the appointment of counsel.

We lack jurisdiction over the denial of Stuart’s request for a temporary restraining order. See Faulder v. Johnson, 178 F.3d 741, 742 (5th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we DENY her motion and DISMISS her appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. Her motion for the appointment of counsel *547 is likewise DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir.1982).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM: *

Leola Adelena Stuart moves for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) on appeal from the district court’s denial of her motion for a restraining order, which was construed as a motion for a temporary restraining order. Additionally, she seeks the appointment of counsel.

We lack jurisdiction over the denial of Stuart’s request for a temporary restraining order. See Faulder v. Johnson, 178 F.3d 741, 742 (5th Cir.1999). Accordingly, we DENY her motion and DISMISS her appeal for lack of jurisdiction. See id. Her motion for the appointment of counsel *547 is likewise DENIED. See Ulmer v. Chancellor, 691 F.2d 209, 212-13 (5th Cir.1982).

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

582 F. App'x 546, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leola-stuart-v-estella-judson-ca5-2014.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack