Leodegario Salvador v. Bank of America, N.A.
This text of 690 F. App'x 1002 (Leodegario Salvador v. Bank of America, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM **
Leodegario Salvador appeals pro se from the district court’s summary judgment in his diversity action seeking to quiet title. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo. Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Owen, 519 F.3d 1035, 1037 (9th Cir. 2008). We affirm.
The district court properly granted summary judgment because Salvador failed to raise a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Bank of America’s interest in the subject property had been extinguished by the foreclosure sale. See Nev. Rev. Stat. § 116.3116 (a Homeowners Association (“HOA”) has a “super priority” lien with respect to other liens, and the HOA’s super priority lien may constitute up to nine months of HOA fees); SFR Invs. Pool 1 v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 130 Nev. Adv. Op. 75, 334 P.3d 408, 414 (2014) (a holder of a first deed of trust may preserve its interest in the subject property if the amount of the super priority lien is tendered prior to the HOA foreclosure sale).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
690 F. App'x 1002, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leodegario-salvador-v-bank-of-america-na-ca9-2017.