Leobardo Araguz v. Dempsie Clinton and Victoria Clinton

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 12, 2018
Docket13-18-00526-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Leobardo Araguz v. Dempsie Clinton and Victoria Clinton (Leobardo Araguz v. Dempsie Clinton and Victoria Clinton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leobardo Araguz v. Dempsie Clinton and Victoria Clinton, (Tex. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NUMBER 13-18-00526-CV

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

LEOBARDO ARAGUZ, APPELLANT,

v.

DEMPSIE CLINTON AND VICTORIA CLINTON, ET AL. APPELLEES. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 107th District Court of Cameron County, Texas ____________________________________________________________

ORDER

Before Justices Rodriguez, Contreras, and Benavides Order Per Curiam

On September 25, 2018, appellant advised the Court that appellees City of

Harlingen, Texas, and City of Harlingen, Texas Police Department have filed a “Notice of

Removal” removing the case and all parties to the United States District Court for the

Southern District of Texas, Brownsville Division on September 18, 2018. Once removal is effected, the state court loses jurisdiction over the case. 28

U.S.C. § 1446(d); Resolution Trust Corp. v. Murray, 935 F.2d 89, 92-93 (5th Cir. 1991).

Any order entered by a state court after the case is removed is void for want of jurisdiction.

Resolution Trust, 935 F.2d at 92-93. Jurisdiction re-vests in the state court when the

federal district court executes the remand order and mails a certified copy to the state

court. Quaestor Invs., Inc. v. Chiapas, 997 S.W.2d 226, 229 (Tex. 1999).

Given these circumstances, we remove this appeal from the Court's docket. This

appeal is abated and will be treated as a closed case. The cause may be reinstated on

prompt motion by any party showing that the cause has been remanded to state court

and specifying what further action, if any, is required from this Court.

PER CURIAM

Delivered and filed this the 12th day of October, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Leobardo Araguz v. Dempsie Clinton and Victoria Clinton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leobardo-araguz-v-dempsie-clinton-and-victoria-clinton-texapp-2018.