Leo Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

Leo Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc.

199 F.2d 957

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedOctober 14, 1952

Docket11475

StatusPublished

This text of 199 F.2d 957 (Leo Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Leo Wurtzburger v. Plough, Inc., 199 F.2d 957 (6th Cir. 1952).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on an appeal from the order of the District Court sustaining the motion of appellee to dismiss the complaint for declaratory judgment, on the grounds that (1) no- actual controversy exists between the parties, and (2) any controversy existing is with respect to federal taxes;

And the court having duly considered the record and the briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties and the oral argument of the attorney for appellee, no appearance at the hearing having been made by attorneys for appellant, is of opinion that the order of the District Court should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the Judge, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This cause came on to be heard on an appeal from the order of the District Court sustaining the motion of appellee to dismiss the complaint for declaratory judgment, on the grounds that (1) no- actual controversy exists between the parties, and (2) any controversy existing is with respect to federal taxes;

And the court having duly considered the record and the briefs of the attorneys for the contending parties and the oral argument of the attorney for appellee, no appearance at the hearing having been made by attorneys for appellant, is of opinion that the order of the District Court should be affirmed for the reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of the Judge, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 F.2d 957, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-wurtzburger-v-plough-inc-ca6-1952.