Leo v. State

444 So. 2d 981, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25425
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 29, 1983·No. No. 82-1320·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a conviction for dealing in stolen property. A review of the evidence leads us to the conclusion that the evidence at trial was legally insufficient and the trial court erred in not entering a judgment of acquittal. Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981).

REVERSED.

ORFINGER, C.J., and DAUKSCH and COBB, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Leo v. State, 444 So. 2d 981, 1983 Fla. App. LEXIS 25425 (Fla. Ct. App. 1983).

444 So. 2d 981 (Leo v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re CN
51 So. 3d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
M.N. v. Department of Children & Family Services
51 So. 3d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2011)
In Interest of AB
444 So. 2d 981 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)