Leo V. Berger Grantor Trust No. 1 v. Adell

292 A.D.2d 295, 739 N.Y.S.2d 258, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3158
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 26, 2002
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 A.D.2d 295 (Leo V. Berger Grantor Trust No. 1 v. Adell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Leo V. Berger Grantor Trust No. 1 v. Adell, 292 A.D.2d 295, 739 N.Y.S.2d 258, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3158 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Louise Gruner Gans, J.), entered January 11, 2001, which, to the extent appealed from, denied the motion of defendants 771 Development LLC and 774 Develop[296]*296ment LLC to dismiss plaintiffs’ causes of action against them, respectively, for aiding and abetting breach of fiduciary duty, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs have sufficiently alleged causes of action against defendants 771 Development LLC and 774 Development LLC for aiding and abetting a breach of fiduciary duty by defendants Matthew Adell and the Adell Corporation (Adellco). In this connection, the allegations of the complaint set forth with the requisite specificity a fiduciary relationship between Matthew Adell, Adellco and plaintiffs; the contemporaneous substantial interest of defendant Matthew Adell in defendants 771 Development and 774 Development; the purchase of real estate by defendants 771 Development and 774 Development from the partnerships on behalf of whom plaintiff limited partners sue, without disclosure to plaintiffs of Matthew Adell’s interests in the purchasing entities, for a price significantly less than could have been obtained in a bona fide arm’s length transaction; and the knowing participation of defendants 771 Development and 774 Development, as purchasers of the allegedly underpriced real estate, in the alleged breach of fiduciary duty (see, Shearson Lehman Bros. v Bagley, 205 AD2d 467). Concur — Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Buckley, Ellerin and Lerner, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Caprer v. Nussbaum
36 A.D.3d 176 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
292 A.D.2d 295, 739 N.Y.S.2d 258, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3158, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/leo-v-berger-grantor-trust-no-1-v-adell-nyappdiv-2002.